“To promote a new regional order in the Middle East that will constitute an iron wall against the Iranian threat and its proxies, for the sake of Israel's security.”
In the wake of the Twelve Day War, a major push for regional peace has emerged. Following the United States’ historical precision strike on Iran’s enrichment facilities, U.S. President Donald Trump, alongside U.S. envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, wasted no time in organizing a game plan to bring peace to the Middle East. In a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the airstrikes, which essentially neutralized the nuclear threat from Iran, the three discussed several interconnected items, including ending the Gaza war within a few weeks time by virtue of a deal that would see all hostages released, Hamas leadership exiled, and the formation of an Arab coalition that would be responsible for the future governance of the strip. In addition to this, the three also discussed the imminent expansion of the Abraham Accords, the landmark 2020 peace initiative that saw four Arab states normalize relations with Israel. Finally, the three discussed public Israeli recognition of a concrete pathway towards Palestinian statehood.
Simultaneous with this, The Israeli Coalition for Regional Security, a group comprised of over a hundred senior Israeli business leaders, launched a campaign calling for the Abraham Alliance, a regional coalition of nations designed to foster peace and security in the Middle East. Their website, www.abrahamshield.org, lists six purpose statements which propose the formation of said regional regional coalition for the explicit purpose of protecting the region from renewed Iranian aggression, in addition to “An Israeli declaration of a gradual, responsible, and secure path to separation from Palestinians, within a decade, as part of a comprehensive regional arrangement.” If the last phrase sounds familiar, it should. The idea of a time-bound, political pathway (i.e., a years long, phased agreement) has been consistently floated by Arab leaders over the past year and a half as a means to bring lasting peace to the region, with the “phased” aspect meant to act as an alternative to the immediate Israeli recognition of a Palestinian state, a non starter for the Israeli Prime Minister.
But if you think the emergence of said Abraham Alliance on the heels of Israel's military incursion into Iran is a coincidence, think again. Just last year, in a speech delivered in front of U.S. Congress, Netanyahu spoke about expanding the Abraham Accords to include a regional security coalition, stating the following:
“All countries that are in peace with Israel and those countries who will make peace with Israel should be invited to join this alliance... The new alliance I envision would be a natural extension of the groundbreaking Abraham Accords... I have a name for this new alliance. I think we should call it the 'Abraham Alliance.'"
- Benjamin Netanyahu, July 2024
In other words, it would appear the formation of the Israeli Coalition for Regional Security - a group allegedly comprised of Israeli business and tech leaders - is actually a soft cover for something with a much deeper level of involvement. Further, it would also appear that concrete steps towards forming the proposed security alliance have been quietly taking shape behind the scenes for quite some time. In a victory speech following the conclusion of Operation Rising Lion (Israel’s military operation in Iran) Prime Minister Netanyahu revealed that,
“With the elimination of Iran's evil axis, we will open an axis of peace and prosperity for the peoples of the region... We are already working on this, vigorously, and the time will come to reveal our actions.”
Now, following the conclusion of the Twelve Day War, new details are starting to emerge that indicate Israeli and Arab leaders, with a little help from the U.S., are preparing to enter final discussions on ending the war in Gaza, implementing the aforementioned regional security alliance, and initiating a time bound, diplomatic pathway towards a two-state solution.
Peace, it would seem, is on the agenda. But what will its outcome be?
For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave woman and one by a free woman.
- Galatians 4:22
The End From The Beginning
If you've been tracking with my publications the past couple of years, you know I've written extensively about the 70th week, reviewing the Biblical signs, as well as the preceding context, that will help us identify when the final seven years of this age are approaching. You may recall that one of the premier signs of the 70th week is, in fact, a security alliance between Israel and the surrounding nations. However, there's more to the 70th week than just a security alliance. This alliance, we're told, follows on the heels of war. Not only that, but when we dive deeper into Israel’s Old Testament history, we see a prophetic pattern emerge - one that specifically revolves around Israel forming security alliances with their neighbors in the face of a regional threat. Of course, it should go without saying that in this case, that regional threat is Iran. However, in previous publications we also learned that Persia (Iran) is a participant - not the leader - of an apocalyptic invasion of Jerusalem at the midpoint of the final seven years. This would indicate that, before that time comes, Iran will lose their spot at the top of the terror totem pole.
And not surprisingly, that's precisely how recent events have unfolded. And now that Iran’s at their weakest point in nearly forty years, the region is teaming up to counter any potential renewal of hostilities. But the formation of a regional alliance following a war isn't the only sign of a rapidly approaching 70th week. The prophets (Daniel specifically) also mention the reinstatement of the Levitical system on the Temple Mount. Of course, the only way this could even be possible is if Jewish access to the hotly contested site were permitted. So what would it take to make this a reality? Slightly ambiguous language buried within the Jerusalem section of the Abraham Accords may provide a clue. In regards to the holy sites, the Accords state they “should remain open for peaceful worshippers of all faiths.” This is because the Abraham Accords (and by extension the Abraham Alliance) are built upon the idea that all of Abraham’s progeny - the descendants of Isaac and the descendants of Ishmael - should live alongside one another in peace and security.
So it shouldn't be surprising to discover that the book of Revelation alludes to exactly that. Not only does John’s apocalyptic vision carry forward Daniel’s prophecy of a rebuilt Temple, but it also gives us another tantalizing detail: The rebuilt Temple that will stand during the 70th week is built on a divided Temple Mount. So you might be wondering, is this something that will emerge from the discussions regarding a pathway towards a two-state solution? While we can't be certain, it's entirely plausible. The reason is simple. Jerusalem, specifically its holy sites, is the epicenter of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Said another way, the conversation about a two-state solution includes the conversation about the Temple Mount. So if talks are underway regarding reaching a two-state solution (and they are), then the Temple Mount is absolutely part of the discussion. Further, the Abrahamic Family House, built in Abu Dhabi in the wake of the Abraham Accords, may be an indicator of where Jerusalem is headed. The interfaith center, which features a mosque, a synagogue, and a church, was built with the express goal of fostering unity amongst the three Abrahamic religions; a prototype, perhaps?
While it remains to be seen, what we can be sure of is that this story is about to begin its final chapter. And like all narratives, its end is rooted in its beginning. What I'm referring to, of course, is God's covenant with Abraham. In Genesis, the very beginning of this story, God promised Abraham that his descendants would inherit a specific tract of land in the Middle East. This land, God said, would be theirs forever. But as is the case in any narrative, a conflict arose - Abraham had two sons. And by human standards, Ishmael, the first born, should’ve been the inheritor of his father's estate, and therefore, the promises. But God's promise was not one that could be realized by natural means. So in order that God's purpose of election might stand, it would be the descendants of Isaac, the miracle child, who would be the recipients of his father's estate. Thus, a millennia-spanning conflict arose between the descendants of Ishmael and the descendants of Isaac; it's no coincidence that Ishmael's lineage can be traced directly to Mohammed, the progenitor of Islam. In other words, the Arab-Israeli conflict, which can just as easily be viewed as a Jewish-Islamic conflict, is simply the final chapter in an ages long controversy that began all the way back in the tents of Abraham. And in this final chapter, one Ishmaelite in particular will rise up to mount a final, apocalyptic assault against God's covenant.
The antichrist.
“But his heart shall be set against the holy covenant.”
- Daniel 11:28
The Alliance Of Ten
There’s likely no bigger misunderstanding in the whole of the prophecy world today than that of the Biblical characteristics of the antichrist. Despite popular (but unbiblical) ideas about universal political control, new age religious beliefs, and initial worldwide acceptance, the Bible describes the final man of sin as a Middle Eastern character who rises from the shadows to eventually commandeer control of a limited coalition of nations within the region. He then uses that control to wage a global assault on Jews and Christians everywhere in the name of his militant religious beliefs - which, according to the Bible’s description, sound eerily reminiscent of radical Islam. However, it's his entry onto the world stage that we're presently interested in. The book of Daniel seems to imply that he'll start out as a small, somewhat insignificant figure who appears on the scene relatively unnoticed, as far as power and clout are concerned. Most famously, the antichrist is said to use deception, along with the prospect of peace, as a means to insert himself into the geopolitical situation occurring at the time of his arrival. Specifically, he uses wit and cunning in order to establish a formal alliance with Israel.
“And from the time that an alliance is made with him he shall act deceitfully, and he shall become strong with a small people.”
- Daniel 11:23
It's also possible that this alliance occurs in very close proximity to, if not simultaneous with, the Daniel 9:27 covenant with the many. In this passage, the antichrist confirms, or strengthens, an agreement with many nations, including Israel, at the onset of the final seven years. However, it's important to note that some interpreters render the passage, “he will make a strong covenant,” instead of, “he will confirm the covenant.” The latter has him joining a preexisting agreement while the former has him authoring the agreement. And it should go without saying that the difference between the two is fairly dramatic. So which one is correct? Simply put, because the Daniel 9:27 covenant is rooted in the Old Testament pattern of Israel entering into security alliances with their neighbors, it seems that the most likely interpretation has the antichrist strengthening a preexisting agreement through his participation in the group’s overall objectives, which, as mentioned previously, probably happens in close proximity to his formal alliance with Israel.
“And he will confirm the covenant with the many for one week…”
- Daniel 9:27
Add to this the fact that Daniel repeatedly states that the antichrist will arise out of a ten nation coalition, and the picture begins to get clearer. The man of sin, we’re told, begins his tenure with this alliance as a relatively insignificant player. However, Daniel goes on to say that eventually, the antichrist moves to overthrow three of the nations within this alliance, ultimately usurping control over the entire group. In other words, a hostile takeover. This power play most likely takes place at the mid-point of the week, when the antichrist drops his mask and begins his forty-two month reign of terror. But the point that must not be missed is that this alliance of ten isn’t a team of “bad guys” at its inception, as some commentators assert. If it were, then why would the antichrist need to use force to seize control of it? Realistically, the alliance of ten is very likely one in the same with the Daniel 9:27 pro-Israel security alliance the antichrist joins at the onset of the 70th week. It’s only later on, halfway through the final seven years, that the antichrist wrecks the alliance, uprooting three of the ten, invading Israel, and moving to take over the entire region.
“As for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings shall arise, and another shall arise after them; he shall be different from the former ones, and shall put down three kings.”
- Daniel 7:24
Said another way, it’s inconsistent to suggest the antichrist joins a regional, pro-Israel alliance at the same time he joins a regional, anti-Israel alliance. Add to that the fact that Scripture says he enters the scene as an insignificant figure who uses the prospect of peace to lure Israel into a false sense of security, and the solution to this apparent discrepancy becomes obvious: The ten nation alliance, the covenant with the many, and the antichrist's formal alliance with the state of Israel are all interconnected. Further, according to Daniel 9:27, all of these threads begin to come together at or near the onset of the final seven years. In other words, as the 70th week is approaching, we should start to see the beginnings of a regional security alliance that, according to the prophets, takes shape on the heels of a major, Israel-centric war. Simultaneous with this, the realistic implementation of some sort of two-state solution should be at the forefront of their agenda. And somewhere in the midst of this emerging alliance will be the man of sin himself.
The only question is, will we believe it when we see it?
“And now I have told you before it takes place, so that when it does take place you may believe.”
- John 14:29
Profile Of An Antichrist
If the emerging Abraham Alliance is, in fact, the last days’ alliance foretold in Scripture, then that means the antichrist is, or will soon be, involved. So the question is, is there anyone currently in the mix who fits the profile of the antichrist? The answer, not surprisingly, is yes. Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa, better known by his nom de guerre Abu Mohammad al-Julani, burst onto the scene in December 2024 when he led his Turkish-sponsored militia, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), in a lightning offensive against the Assad regime in Syria. Weakened from Israel's war against Iran’s proxies, Assad, a vassal of the Iranian regime, was a sitting duck. Without Hezbollah to come to his defense, Assad’s regime crumbled within days under al-Julani’s might. The blitzkrieg was eerily reminiscent of the antichrist's future military moves foretold in Daniel and Revelation. Nevertheless, once the dust had settled, al-Julani was unanimously chosen as interim president by his jihadist cohorts, after which he quickly proceeded to dissolve all Assad-era institutions, form a new legislative council, and announce elections would not be held for several years. In just under two months after launching his assault, the new jihadi in town had his very own country.
“He shall come in without warning and obtain the kingdom through intrigue.”
- Daniel 11:21
So who is this shadowy new figure who, up until just six months ago, was unknown to the world at large? Born in Saudi Arabia in 1982 to Syrian parents, al-Julani grew up in the Syrian Golan Heights. Following the September 11th attacks and subsequent U.S. war on terror, he relocated to Baghdad to join al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI). It was at this time he adopted his war name, al-Julani. He would eventually be captured by U.S. forces and spend five years in U.S. detention centers, where he would meet Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the infamous (and at that time future) leader of ISIS. After his release in 2011, al-Julani traveled back to Syria under al-Baghdadi’s orders to establish an al-Qaeda affiliate. His new group would go on to become one of the primary forces in the Syrian civil war. However, al-Julani decided to rebrand the group in 2017 in order to publicly distance himself from al-Qaeda and forge a more pragmatic, nationalist image. Under its new moniker, HTS would emerge as the leader of the anti-Assad movement, eventually leading a coalition of Syrian factions against Damascus in a lightning assault last December. Following the formation of al-Julani's government, the group was disbanded, with its soldiers being absorbed into the new Syrian army alongside several insurgent groups that fought in the siege.
“A fierce king, insolent and skilled in intrigue, shall arise.”
- Daniel 8:23
You might think that someone with a reputation such as al-Julani’s would struggle to win favor with regional leaders. However, the past six months have revealed just the opposite. Not only has al-Julani become a hero amongst his countrymen, but regional power players such as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman have repeatedly vouched for the rising star, claiming that al-Julani has reformed, and that he's left his jihadist past behind him in favor of a fresh start. To this end, the former al-Qaeda militant has completely rebranded himself, opting to ditch his turban and fatigues for a three piece suit and even reverting back to his pre-al-Qaeda name, Ahmed al-Sharaa. Moreover, he's made a point to emphasize the democratic and diverse nature of his Western-style government, highlighting the need to bring peace and stability to Syria, a country that's been ravaged by over a decade of civil war. But is Ahmed al-Sharaa, as he now prefers to be called, really a new man? Or just a wolf in sheep's clothing - one who happens to have the favor of the larger Arab world and his own army?
“By his cunning he shall make deceit prosper under his hand, and in his own mind he shall become great.”
- Daniel 8:25
Al-Sharaa’s transformation from a dyed-in-the-wool jihadist to a pragmatic power broker has naturally been met with hesitation by some observers. A cursory overview of the shadowy figure reveals a highly intelligent, ambitious, natural leader with a keen understanding of both military strategy and the political landscape. Most notably, he’s demonstrated an almost chameleon-like ability to adapt to his circumstances in a way that suits his position, transitioning ideologically and organizationally on several occasions. Former associates have described him as shrewd, manipulative, and dangerously calculating. And in the six short months that he's been president, al-Sharaa has managed to persuade the United States to remove all sanctions against Syria, as well as the $10 million bounty on his own head. But perhaps most shockingly of all, al-Sharaa has repeatedly expressed a strong desire to establish formal ties with the state of Israel. And just this past week, in what can only be described as a jaw dropping headline, news broke that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is planning to travel to the U.S. within the next two weeks to discuss, among other things, a normalization deal that would incorporate Syria into the Abraham Accords. But it may be more than just diplomatic ties that al-Sharaa is aiming for, if you get the picture.
The Abraham Alliance
There's no question al-Sharaa meets the Biblical criteria set forth for the antichrist in regards to his personality, character, motivations, and activities. Moreover, the timing and nature of his arrival on the world stage make him a prime candidate for the man of sin. And the fact that such an unlikely and unsavory character is seeking normalization with Israel, as well as integration into the broader Abraham Alliance, is extremely noteworthy. Taken as a whole, he seems to fit the Biblical profile of the antichrist par excellence. But does he meet the geographic requirements? The answer is actually fairly nuanced. Generally speaking, the Bible depicts the antichrist emerging from the area of the historical Assyrian empire. This includes the region corresponding to the modern day nations of Syria, Iraq, and Turkey. Obviously, this geography aligns perfectly with al-Sharaa's current role as president of Syria, as well as with his extensive history of militant activity in the greater Iraq and Syria area in general. In other words, when we take into consideration the geographic prerequisites for the man of sin, al-Sharaa once again appears to check all the boxes.
“When the Assyrian invades our land, when he tramples our citadels…”
- Micah 5:5
However, Ezekiel 38 explicitly states that Gog (i.e, the antichrist) is the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, areas that virtually all historians and Biblical scholars agree correspond to modern-day Turkey. Moreover, Gog is also said to hail from the land of Magog, which is also widely identified as an ancient region located within Asia Minor (modern day Turkey). So how do we resolve this apparent discrepancy? First, it's helpful to recognize that al-Sharaa's former group, HTS, was a Turkish sponsored militia. Turkish president Recep Erdogan, with his neo-Ottoman ambitions, has used militias such as HTS for almost a decade in order to gain a foothold in Syria and Iraq (former Ottoman territory). In other words, al-Sharaa is intimately aligned with Turkey’s expansionist vision. Further, it's entirely possible that, due to his close relationship with Turkey, al-Sharaa could move in to usurp power at some point using the same intrigue and cunning he employed to seize control in Syria. If so, this would align quite well with Daniel 11:21, which could just as easily describe a future power grab in Turkey as it does his previous rise in Syria. Further, Ezekiel 38 only requires that the antichrist be a Turkish leader at the midpoint of the 70th week. Therefore, it's entirely possible for him to join the alliance of ten as a Syrian leader only to make a move into Turkey during the first half of the week.
“In his place shall arise a contemptible person to whom royal majesty has not been given. He shall come in without warning and obtain the kingdom through intrigue.”
- Daniel 11:21
While it may not be possible to understand every detail, it's nonetheless become increasingly clear that we’re quickly approaching the advent of the climactic 70th week. On top of everything else, Hamas continues to demand a seven year ceasefire as a resolution to the Gaza war - a number that should ring a bell with students of prophecy. It's also entirely possible that this timeline will overlap with the phased, years-long agreement for a pathway to Palestinian separation (i.e., a two-state solution) that’s central to the Abraham Alliance. In support of this point, their website lists the timeline for its completion as “within a decade” of its launch. And, as stated earlier, the issue of jurisdiction over the Temple Mount will almost certainly be addressed in this resolution. So if we really are at the threshold of the 70th week, we should expect to see this resolution result in joint access to the Temple Mount. Of course, I don't have to tell you what the implications of that are. In short, the definitive sign that will give us absolute certainty that we are indeed transitioning into the final seven years is the reinstatement of the Levitical system on the Temple Mount - an event that necessarily requires Jewish access to the Temple Mount.
“Do not measure the court outside the temple; leave that out, for it is given over to the nations, and they will trample the holy city for forty-two months.”
- Revelation 11:2
Yet, despite all of the obstacles, a shared Temple Mount is the most probable outcome in this scenario. Why? Simply put, the Abraham Alliance is built upon the idea of complete reconciliation between the Jewish and Islamic worlds - reconciliation between Isaac and Ishmael, as it were. In fact, if this deal moves forward (and all indications are that it will), it would be odd for something of this sort not to happen. After all, the Temple Mount is the holiest site in Judaism and the third holiest site in Islam. And it's looking more and more like the only realistic solution is to literally divide what's most precious to both - a true Solomon-like verdict. And if you think all of this is a bridge too far, think again. According to the vision of the Abraham Alliance taken straight from their website, “This is the historic opportunity to rebuild the State of Israel as a safe and stable Jewish-democratic national home, where young families can raise their children in safety and prosperity.” It won't be long before exuberant shouts of “Peace and Safety!” begin to echo throughout the valleys and the foothills of Israel.
Yes, it is time for a new Middle East. The question is, will you recognize it before the door of the 70th week has slammed shut behind you?
“The end of all things is near; therefore, be of sound judgement and sober spirit for the purpose of prayer.”
- 1st Peter 4:7
Helpful links:
For a thorough review of the Biblical context and signs of the 70th week, complete with Biblical references, I strongly recommend reading the articles below, as this present article builds upon them.
https://practicalprophecy.substack.com/p/daniels-70th-week-timing-is-everything?r=17k0tf
https://practicalprophecy.substack.com/p/daniels-70th-week-practically-prophetic?r=17k0tf
Relevant new articles:
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-859329
https://www.israelhayom.co.il/news/geopolitics/article/18288137
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-set-to-visit-white-house-july-7-as-us-pushes-for-end-to-gaza-war/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-in-advanced-talks-for-deal-to-end-hostilities-with-syria-says-senior-official/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/hamas-changes-to-hostage-deal-proposal-include-demand-for-7-year-ceasefire-israeli-official-says/
Abraham Alliance website:
www.abrahamshield.org
The Assyrian is not the king of Syria. The Assyrian is the Dan 8 Little Horn (Dan 8's 2300 days= 5 months (Rev 9:5) + 'hour, day, month, year' (Rev 9:15) + 1260 days (Rev 11:2) + 3.5 days (Rev 11:11) + '70 weeks to finish the transgression' (Dan 9:24) = 2300 days. The Assyrian is the 'despicable person' of Dan 11:21-45 (compare Dan 11:30's ships of Kittim to Num 24:24's ships of Kittim that subdue Asshur (Assyria)).
Matt 24:29-30's sign of the son of man in heaven is the Rev 12 sign of the woman at the 7th Trumpet which is Isa 7 & 8's sign of Immanuel indicating the start of the kingdom of heaven (the land of milk & honey in Isa 7:15-25).
In Isa 7 & 8, it is the Assyrian that destroys Syria & Ephraim to the benefit of Judah. Syria & Ephraim are in conspiracy to overthrow Judah to install a puppet governor (the 'son of Tabeal' who is maybe the Rev 13 false prophet).
To reduce so much of prophecy to just Dan 9:27 is to ensure confusion. The person who is confirming Dan 9:27 is the Rev 10 mighty angel who is swearing an oath to heaven (see Deut 4:31 & Hos 10:4 among many verses illustrating swearing an oath enacting a covenant). The king of Tyre is described as an 'angel' (Ezek 28:14) and is one of the ten members of the Psalm 83 coalition (along with Edom, Ammon, and Moab, the 3 horns uprooted so as to prove that Tyre (Isa's Lucifer) is the messiah (Isa 11:1-14).
In Dan 11 terms, the Assyrian attacks Israel (the king of the South - South being 'negev' desert of the land of Israel) at the start of the Trumpets (Dan 11:25-26).
The Assyrian attacks Israel a 2nd time 5 months later to place the abomination (Dan 11:31) (at the 6th Trumpet). This is not Dan 9:27 yet! This is Dan 9:26's 'people of the prince to come destroy / 'corrupt' the city & sanctuary'. This is the abomination referenced in Matt 24:15, not the 2nd abomination at Dan 9:27. First, the abomination is in Jerusalem, then it is taken to Mystery Babylon (Shinar) (Zech 5:5-11) (1290 days later at the 7th Trumpet).
The Dan 12 'man in linen' is an angel (Dan 10:5-6) and is the same entity as the Rev 10 'mighty' (Greek word for the Hebrew 'gabar' to make strong) angel. He is the 'dragon' ('fiery serpent' translates as seraphim angel) that is deceiving the world (Rev 12:9). It is the Dan 12 man in linen that is confirming the covenant, swearing an oath to heaven. The 'time, times, half a time' that follows the swearing in Dan 12:7 is the same 1260 days following the Rev 10 Angel (the time of the 2 witnesses).
When he breaks the covenant, he 'goes into heaven to call himself God' (Isa 14:14), he is removed from heaven by Michael, then he hands his kingdom over to the Rev 13 Beast from Sea and Earth. This is the start of the 7th Trumpet. The 7 bowls of wrath remove and destroy the Beast.
In simpler terms, just read Dan 9:24-27 literally. The 'call to restore Jerusalem' (Dan 9:24) can be the call to rebuild the temple on - Jerusalem Day, naturally... (happening on May 25/26, 2025) https://www.newsofisrael.com/middle-east/2025-05-28/smotrichs-provocative-temple-rebuilding-call-stirs-controversy/
7 weeks later, July 14, 2025, we will see what occurs (if this hypothesis is correct). The 'troublous times' of Dan 9:25 could be the time of the Seals. After 62 weeks (Dan 9:26a), the 'anointed one' (whoever this is, maybe Pope Leo) is cut off, starting the Trumpets and 5 months of 'locusts' (forces of the Assyrian that 'rise up to place the abomination' in Dan 11:31 at the 6th Trumpet).
69 weeks would see the anointing of a holy one on Yom Kippur, Sept. 21, 2026 (which would be taking place within the 5 months of the 5th Trumpet).
The 6th Trumpet would start the 1290 days. Rev 9:13-21 would last for 30 days, then the Rev 10 Mighty Angel would start/ confirm the Dan 9:27 covenant.